September 29, 2013

Lost Daughters: Whose Interests Do We Serve?




"In current adoption law, adoptee's birth certificates are "amended" (falsified) to state that new parents actually gave birth.  It attempts to create an alternative reality by legally erasing a child's God-given identity and family connections.

It is this persistent under-world of 

double-messages and indoctrination of "positive" adoption language, coupled with unethical laws and practices promising "forever families" to paying customers, which led our court system and popular opinion to applaud the abusive separation from her family that Veronica Brown was forced to endure...and continues to endure.  Veronica Brown?  She's been erased.

She is paying the cost of keeping this adoption system "viable" by losing all she is and loves...for whose best interest?"


"It is hard to fathom this Court allowing the enforcement of an adoption decree entered in direct contravention of the Oklahoma and U.S. Constitutions.

  ~ Justice Noma Gurich ~

     Read entire article at:  Lost Daughters: Whose Interests Do We Serve?
For the best overview of the Baby Veronica case click here:  http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/03/1243613/-Adoption-Series-part-2-Veronica-Brown

September 25, 2013

Here, Veronica, Here Girl

Dog Adoption Certificate
© Photographer: Roughcollie | Agency: Dreamstime.com


"It is hard to fathom this Court allowing the enforcement of an adoption decree entered in direct contravention of the Oklahoma and U.S. Constitutions.
  ~ Justice Noma Gurich ~

Our entire nation watched a traumatized four year old girl be taken from her family.  We not only watched it, our government escorted her.  It was far from "peaceful" for her.  It is state-sanctioned abuse.  Without the excuse of "adoption", any other child would have been saved from such a kidnapping.        

Adoption law turned her into a non-person.  She has no more rights than a dog being led away from its breeder.

"Adoptive Couple VERSUS Baby Girl" should teach us that our adoption system in America is not only flawed, it is abusive.  The adoption industry has brainwashed our entire nation to the point we let a child be kidnapped on national television.   

Veronica is the face of adoption in our country now.  And the atrocity it did to her is not just one-time collateral damage.

Coercion, fraud, conflict of interest, biased "counseling", and LOTS OF MONEY (disguised as "fees" and "expenses") continue to turn adoption into a "business" model that ignores human rights and best interests of children and their families.  The adoption brokers that bought and sold Veronica are still in business.  Even in "good" adoptions, money still exchanges hands and identities are stolen.  Adoptees live their entire lives as someone else, with no access to their genealogy. They are non-persons.  

It reminds me of one of the ridiculous comments I heard made during the Adoption Review Task Force meetings I attended at our state capitol.  Mind you, the majority of this "task force", charged with making recommendations in adoption law, was comprised of those who earn their living off adoption.  My colleague and I arrived a little early and introduced ourselves to two other ladies. When we mentioned that we were an adoptee and a first mother, we got the same familiar blank looks we are used to...most people are speechless to meet a real live adult adoptee or first mother. What took the cake, though, was the response of one of these ladies.

"Well, I don't have any PERSONAL experience with adoption...but I have a special puppy!"  Like that was comparable?  We looked at each other with disbelief when later during the meeting she was introduced as the presenter from the Department of Mental Health, invited to speak about "Trauma".  Of course, she was clueless and it showed.

The sad part about this story ~ adult adoptees are used to this.  It didn't surprise me at all...but it did sadden me, considering this is the mindset of those who are considered "professionals" in the field.  Those who legislators were looking to for "recommendations" to address the 2006 OK Grand Jury Report regarding unethical behaviors of adoption brokers.  More lip-service

This is the typical societal attitude about adoption ~ children are blank slates, much like puppies. They can be tossed around and given new "papers" and new homes, new identities, and new lives without much thought...except for the expectation to be grateful that someone would "take them in." Sadly, dogs have more accurate pedigrees than most adoptees have accurate birth certificates.

Do a search for "adoption" on any newspaper's website and try to weed through the dog pound "adoption" articles listed right along articles regarding adoption of children...they are always lumped together ~ and, unfortunately, our society doesn't treat the adoption of children much more ethically . Adoption is the highest money-making unregulated industry in America.

When questioned about the Federal Adoption Incentive, and how this could be an influencing factor in the overall philosophy & policies governing how we "care" for Oklahoma's children, the presenter "did not know the numbers."

DHS (Oklahoma "Swift Adoptions") receives a $4,000 (or higher) "bonus" from the federal government (our tax dollars) for most finalized adoptions of kids in state care. That added up to $1.5 million last year alone. Tell me this doesn't influence the WAY in which state government operates ~ from parental termination of rights decisions, to preparation (or lack thereof) of potential adoptive parents, to which children we focus on "saving" (and how).  That could be why our child welfare systems are in trouble.  We are neglecting the children who need our help in order to focus on how to increase our federal matching dollars.

In 2008, Oklahoma had the 3rd highest adoption rate in the nation.  Our ICPC Officer (who is contracted and paid by DHS to approve all inter-state adoptions) is also the owner of an adoption agency.  The same attorneys involved with Veronica's adoption are still in business and babies such as Deserai and Jarred are still in legal limbo over the same unregulated and contested issues. 

I'm only talking about all this because this is the state we live in.  The state that failed Veronica.  A state very invested ~ from top to bottom. 

Money and adoption can never be ethically intertwined. Yet here we are.  And there Veronica is in a strange home, with people who reportedly may have been unfit to adopt a child in "public" care, but who our court systems allowed to kidnap a child away from her own father...through money and unethical adoption brokers. 

Any father who would fight in court for his daughter from the time she was four months old (when he was finally informed of the adoption "plan") is far from the "abandoner" he is being made to look in mainstream media.  Even though Veronica was whisked out of state at birth, the adoption was never finalized and Dusten was awarded custody two years ago, because it had been unethical and contested from day one. 

S.C. Judge Malphrus (the only court that actually held a trial) concluded that Dusten had been a "thwarted" father.  See the ruling here:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/169266799/2011-Malphrus-Ruling

"Even if ICWA does not apply I find that birth father's consent to the adoption was necessary and he has not consented to this adoption.  I find that he was a 'thwarted father' as that term is defined in Abernathy vs. Baby Boy.

When parental rights and the best interest of the child are in conflict, the best interest of the child must prevail.  In this case, I find no conflict in the two.  The best interests of the child are protected by not terminating father's parental rights...a child is not property."

Veronica had been living happily with her natural family in Oklahoma for two years.  Why should she have to pay for an unethical court and adoption system whose appeals process treated her more like a piece of property, rather than a human-being with rights to her own family? 

Adoption agencies are notorious for using unethical practices against pesky fathers.  It makes adoption too "risky" for their customers. Why would they work so hard to turn Dusten into a "criminal", except to deflect this atrocity off the real reason America allowed this child to be transferred like a piece of property...the largest unregulated industry in America.  Someone has to pay in order to ensure society continues to buy in to a positive philosophy of adoption.  Veronica is paying the cost.

We sit back and watch a child be subject to state-sanctioned abuse.  Her best interests were completely ignored for the purpose of making sure the "establishment" of adoption is preserved.  For whose best interest?

Here, Veronica, here Girl...come get your cookie.

For the best overview of this case click here:  http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/03/1243613/-Adoption-Series-part-2-Veronica-Brown

September 19, 2013

Letters

                                      
                            Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves;
                                       ensure justice for those being crushed.
                         Yes, speak up for the helpless, and see that they get justice.
                                                        Proverbs 31:8-9                     
      
Adoption brokers that profit off the sale of adoptees, desperately need to "save face" at all costs in "Adoptive Couple vs. Baby Girl" (the title of the case says it all). 

They also lobby state legislatures not to pass model legislation supported by The Child Welfare League of America, restoring the unconditional right of adult adoptees to their original birth certificates. 

I wonder why?  Who knows what is under "seal" if the ethics of the so-called "adoption" of Veronica is any clue?

"Settlement" sounds like a business transaction.  We "settle" on property disputes.  Veronica is not property.  It would be abusive to require her participation in a completely unnecessary "shared" custody agreement.  It is certainly not in her best interest.    

I wonder how many letters adoptees across this nation have written...in search of their identities...their medical histories....their families? 

Sadly, letters are all we have.  I pray Veronica will be spared letter writing later, by letters so many are writing on her behalf now.

"I grew up loving my adoptive parents and we are still very close.  I've also been blessed to reunite with my natural family over twenty years ago.  It has taken a life-time to overcome the identity, loss, and loyalty issues which every adopted person hides personally within their hearts. 

I am concerned that Veronica's voice is being lost.  She is not a child who needs a home, which is the intended purpose of adoption. 

The potential adoptive parents could have honored her with the right to her own family.  No matter how "good" or "bad" an adoption is, it means a human being loses normal connections with their family and identity, and they have to fulfill a role in a family they were not born into or share genetic likeness.  Veronica has never been a child who needs a home, which is the intended purpose of adoption. 
 
The money and marketing in America's unregulated adoption industry, create an environment for coercion, fraud, and human rights violations, and prevents those children who truly need homes from finding them. 

Fighting a child's parent in order to take them as "their own" is inhumane and a society which values this practice over the right of a child to their own family is far from healthy. 

Even in legitimate adoptions, why should giving a child a home require them to deny their own God-given identity, heritage, and family history in order to receive care?  Is it a matter of possession?

Even "open" adoptions are not legally enforceable, and some original birth certificates are being falsified with potential adoptive parents names, before an adoption is finalized.  These adopted individuals will never have recourse to know who they are.

When money is exchanged in adoption transactions, and birth certificates are "amended" and "sealed", it makes adopted people feel less than human.  The only other Americans whose identities were stolen and money was paid for their exchange, were American slaves. 
 
Australia has reformed their adoption practices and even issued a national apology to their citizens. 
 
Please hear the voices of adopted people, and spare Veronica from an adoption that is completely unnecessary and unethical. 
 
Sincerely ~