July 28, 2009

Oak tree
© Photographer: Littlemacproductions | Agency: Dreamstime.com

How can I grow
if I have no roots?

I am a limb and
I have been grafted
From an oak tree onto
A flowering peach.

I shall bear no fruit
But I am expected to bloom.
I am expected to give birth
to beautiful, golden peaches.

Having lived on a tree
with which I share no roots,
I am living by the rules
Mother Earth has set
forth for this tree.

I do not breathe or move
That I do not wonder if I
Shall wrong this tree.
I have found that in the
Spring I am expected to bloom.
I do not bloom.

I would like to be myself, to
grow straight and strong,
As my heart is pulling; but
I am expected to be filled
with golden fruit.

What will I do? I must do what
My feelings direct me to do.
I am an oak. I am not sure
what kind of oak, but I am
an oak. I can feel it in my
heart and in my soul.

I must search and find out what
kind of oak I am.
I must find out
what is to become of me.

I am expected to bear golden fruit.
I will never be able to do such a thing.
But I can become a beautiful chair
or a piano grande.

Author: Martha Josephine Wilkinson-Droll, doing life as Mary Martha Apperson (Molly)
(A beautiful adoptee friend whose first mother happens to have been a concert pianist).

July 25, 2009


A daughter is telling her Mother how everything is going wrong, she's failing algebra, her boyfriend broke up with her and her best friend is moving away.

Meanwhile, her Mother is baking a cake and asks her daughter if she would like a snack, and the daughter says, 'Absolutely Mom, I love your cake.'

'Here, have some cooking oil,' her Mother offers. 'Yuck' says her daughter.

'How about a couple raw eggs?' 'Gross, Mom!'

'Would you like some flour then? Or maybe baking soda?'

'Mom, those are all yucky!'

To which the mother replies: 'Yes, all those things seem bad all by themselves. But when they are put together in the right way, they make a wonderfully delicious cake! '

God works the same way. Many times we wonder why He would let us go through such bad and difficult times. But God knows that when He puts these things all in His order, they always work for good! We just have to trust Him and, eventually, they will all make something wonderful! God is crazy about you. He sends you flowers every spring and a sunrise every morning. Whenever you want to talk, He'll listen. He can live anywhere in the universe, and He chose your heart.

Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we are here we might as well dance!

July 24, 2009

Adoptee Rights Protest 2009 Philly

Adoptees and OBC's


Adoptees protest for access to original birth certificates
By Jeff Gammage
Wed, Jul. 22, 2009
Philadelphia Inquirer Staff Writer

Former Maine State Sen. Paula Benoit stood at an information booth yesterday, trying to persuade people to follow the Pine Tree State:

Let adult adoptees have their original birth certificates.

It's not as simple as it sounds. Those records are sealed in 44 states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey. And for Benoit, pushing legislative colleagues toward change has been difficult.

"They're oftentimes open-minded and will listen," she said. "But if there's not enough people in their constituency, they won't support it because there's nothing in it for them."

Yesterday, Benoit, herself adopted, staffed a booth for the Adoptee Rights Coalition, among the groups pressing their causes to the National Conference of State Legislatures, which is holding its annual meeting at the Convention Center.

Benoit, a Republican, now works as executive director of Maine-based Adoptee CARE, the Adoptee Council for Adoption Reform Education, which means traveling to events like the one in Philadelphia.

Outside the hall yesterday, about 120 adoptees and birth parents from as far as England staged a loud, sign-waving demonstration. They marched to the Convention Center from People's Plaza, near Independence Hall, ignoring the rain, helped by police who stopped traffic at Market Street crossroads.

"You got yours . . ." came the call from protest organizers.

"I want mine!" shouted the marchers.

Tourists and pedestrians, confused or amused, stood aside to let them pass.

"You deserve your rights!" one bystander shouted at the group, adding, "My cousin's adopted."

In the United States, laws passed in the 1930s and 1940s created "amended birth certificates" that replaced the names of biological parents with those of adoptive parents. Adoption was considered shameful, and experts favored permanent separation between birth parents and children.

Today it's common for birth parents, adoptive parents, and children to be in contact. But only Alaska, Oregon, Kansas, Alabama, New Hampshire, and Maine allow adult adoptees to have unrestricted access to their original birth records. And the battle over access ranks among the most controversial issues in the field.

The National Council for Adoption, a well-known advocacy and policy group, staunchly opposes open records, saying that birth mothers who were promised privacy deserve to keep it. State chapters of Planned Parenthood and the ACLU are opposed, as are Catholic organizations.

None of those groups were present yesterday - nor did they need to be. They're winning the argument, noted adoptee Dan Haines of Egg Harbor. That forces adoptees to mount a state-by-state appeal to lawmakers that could go on forever.

And while that happens, he said, birth parents grow old and die.

That fact lends urgency to what adoptees call the nation's last civil-rights battle.

"There's no sane reason for us not to have the information," said Heather Holmes, an adoptee who was born in New York and raised in England.

On Monday, she met her biological mother for the first time, at Philadelphia International Airport. They've corresponded for several years, connecting after each searched for the other.

"Whatever relationship adults want to have, it's not the government's business," Holmes said in a crisp English accent.

"It's a major Big Brother thing," added her mother, Carole Baker, of Orlando, Fla.

The nation's newest open-records law took effect Jan. 2 in Maine. Benoit, defeated for reelection, went immediately to get her birth certificate.

She discovered she was one of nine siblings - and that two Maine state legislators were her nephews.

Her work for Adoptee CARE often involves telling her story, explaining to legislators that adoptees can't get their birth records.

"Half of them don't even know," she said. "They say, 'I have adopted nieces and nephews, and they can't get their original birth certificates?' "
----------------------------------------

Contact staff writer Jeff Gammage at 215-854-2415 or jgammage@phillynews.com .

Find this article at:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20090722_Adoptees_protest_for_access_to_original_birth_certificates.html

July 19, 2009

Adoption or Child Trafficking?

Expensive Pregnancy 1
                             © Photographer: Camptown | Agency: Dreamstime.com

Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.
Martin Luther King, Jr.

Nothing can adequately articulate the sincere disgust and angst of this ADOPTEE as I recently sat through a five hour meeting of adoption "professionals" debating & informing legislators regarding what expenses and advertising should be "allowable" in adoption. Hearing stories of contested adoption expenses being brought before our state's Supreme Court (even now) of $120,000 plus, with attorneys using the argument of agreed upon "contracts" for why Judges should not be able to question the ethics or need behind these exorborant prices. Watching the "task force" members (most of which happen to make their living working for adoption agencies or attorneys) sweat bullets and pass dire looks to one another when these issues are addressed; arguing their points of how we need to make sure our state remains "adoption friendly" so birth mothers will find it easy to choose this "heroic" path; so adoptive couples won't "go out of state" if we make it TOO hard to adopt here.

Isn't this debate clear enough? Can we just say it plainly ~ Babies are hard to come by, waiting lists of potential adoptive couples are miles long; we don't want competition; and we need to be able to do whatever it takes to fulfill the desires of desperate parents who will pay just about ANYTHING to get the elusive infant they have longed for. Even if that means lobbying for putting NO CAPS on "allowable expenses" ~ BUYING BABIES. All in the name of adoption.

Even more discouraging was having to sit through this entire meeting as a virtually silent spectator. My "place" was tucked away along the wall, with other concerned adoptees, on the fringes, able only to observe the decision-makers sit at the table, the inner-circle, in their big comfy chairs, with plenty of room to spread out, eat, and organize their space freely. It was pointed out during the meeting that an actual adoptee would be soon appointed to the "task force" (only because adoptees have refused to remain silent during this process), but that the chosen adoptee will not be "overly emotional," but have "balanced" views.

{This simply means the chosen adoptee will not be one voicing their civil right to obtain their original birth certificate like every other American citizen ~ even though six U.S. states have already passed laws restoring this important right to their state's adopted citizens. Inevitably, more states will do so every year ~ simply because it is the right thing to do ~ though vehemently opposed by the very "professionals" who distract and fight the legislature and judges over "allowable expenses" for their baby-selling businesses. So unfortunate and sad for the very babies who will only grow up to be the same adult adoptees who sit on the fringes, as pawns (means "to put up") in the business of human-selling, without the same identity rights as others.}

When ANY MONEY exchanges hands in adoption it should be considered trafficking. Especially since the child's original name, genealogical and medical histories are SEALED from them indefinitely, and AMENDED (falsified) Certificates of Live Birth are issued, stating that people gave birth to them that didn't. Look at Australia. Adoption is done completely without financial exchange. It is not seen as in America ~ a way to build a family, but as it should be ~ ONLY in the best interest of a child who needs a home, not a home that needs a child.

July 13, 2009

No Stork Involved...


No Stork Involved, but Mom and Dad Had Help
By SARA RIMER
2009

Melissa Brisman and her daughter, Simmie, age 6, were catching a
matinee of “Marley and Me” in Tenafly, N.J.

It was supposed to be a movie about a dog named Marley. But up on the
big screen, Marley’s owner, a glowing Jennifer Aniston, kept getting
pregnant — serenely, effortlessly pregnant (after one miscarriage).

Jumping up on her seat, Simmie loudly asked her mother, “How come
you’re the only mommy who can’t get pregnant?”

“Sit down,” whispered Mrs. Brisman, who is a lawyer specializing in
surrogacy. “We’ll talk about this later.”

Every child has a birth story. The story of Simmie, who was born to a
surrogate, is different from the stories of the three children in the
movie. But her story, which is also the story of her 11-year-old twin
brothers, Andrew and Benjamin, is less unusual than it used to be.

While there is no widely agreed upon number for surrogate births, the
American Society for Reproductive Medicine estimates 400 to 600 births
a year from 2003 to 2007 in which a surrogate was implanted with a
fertilized egg. Advocacy groups put the count much higher — including
most recently to the actors Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick
— and say the numbers will increase as more people, including gay men,
turn to surrogacy to become parents.

So despite the substantial costs (at least $30,000), there is now a
group of young children whose parents are wrestling with this modern
twist on the eternal question: Where did I come from?

These parents have to take the often excruciating saga of all they
went through to have a baby and turn it into a child-friendly,
reassuring and true Your Birth Story.

So many parents are trying to figure out how to tell this new story
that Judith Kottick, a licensed social worker in Montclair, N.J.,
provides counseling in just that area. “What kids want to know is that
they’re in the family they were meant to be in — that they belong to
their mom and dad,” she said.

She advises parents to start telling their children’s birth story
early. “You want them to grow up with the information so it’s not a
news flash,” Ms. Kottick said. She also recommends some of the new
children’s books that are tailored to the story of birth through
surrogacy, like “Hope & Will Have a Baby: The Gift of Surrogacy” by
Irene Celcer.

Marla Culliton and her husband, Steven, of Swampscott, Mass., have 7-
year-old twins, Jacob and Naomi. “When they were 4, I told them,
‘First you have to get married, then you have to have a nice house,
then you can go to a doctor, and he can help you,’ ” said Mrs.
Culliton, a dental hygienist. “At 5, they said, ‘How is the baby
made?’ I said: ‘They come from a sperm and an egg. The doctor made you
in a dish.’ ”

If anyone has been preparing for The Talk, it is these parents, who
have often spent years trying to have children. “You know how you sit
down at night, talking to them, telling them stories?” said Jan
Zoretich, who has two children, Sarah Elizabeth, 5, and Rachel, 3,
born through surrogacy. “From Day 1,” she said, referring to Sarah
Elizabeth, “I said: ‘Mommy’s so happy. You’re such a blessing. We’re
so grateful Jessica was a surrogate for us.’ ”

In Sarah Elizabeth’s birth story, Jessica, whom the family prefers to
identify only by her first name and who lives in the same Maryland
town, is a central character. “She comes to the door, and I’ll say,
‘Sarah, your surro’s here,’ ” said Mrs. Zoretich, a former chief
financial officer for a group of nursing homes who now stays home with
her children.

Mrs. Brisman, the lawyer, who also runs an agency that connects
prospective parents with surrogates, began telling Simmie her birth
story when she was about 3. (“The doctor took a piece of Daddy and
took a piece of Mommy and put it inside someone else because my tummy
was broken.”)

Mrs. Brisman, who contends that the estimates from the American
Society for Reproductive Medicine on the numbers of surrogate births
are far too low, said her clients alone had 300 babies through
surrogacy last year, with gay men becoming parents in 20 percent of
the cases.

Jeffrey T. Parsons, a Manhattan psychologist and his partner, Chris
Hietikko, have a 3-year-old son, Henry, who sees his surrogate,
Jessica, at least once a year.

When their son starts asking questions at, say age 5, said Dr.
Parsons, a psychology professor at Hunter College, “I would probably
relate it to one of his friends. I’d say, ‘You’ve met your friend
Michael’s dad and mom. You have two dads, right? Well, it takes a mom
to make a baby because they grow them in their tummy. That’s Jessica.”

The television host Joan Lunden, 58, has become a celebrity
spokeswoman for surrogacy since she and her second husband, Jeff,
became parents of two sets of twins, now 4 and 6. Their surrogate,
Deborah Bolig, has become a part of their large, extended family. This
is how Ms. Lunden has described their surrogate to her twins: “She’s a
woman in our lives we greatly respect, she helped us have Kate and Max
and Kim and Jack.”

Although she considers her children too young for a talk about embryos
and uteruses, Ms. Lunden already has a metaphor ready for when the
time comes: cupcakes. “It’s almost like we can’t cook the cupcakes in
our oven because the oven is broken,” she said. “We’re going to use
the neighbor’s oven.”

Fay Johnson, whose two children, Lily and Chase, now 19 and 15, were
born through traditional surrogacy — the surrogate was also the egg
donor, with the sperm from Mrs. Johnson’s husband
— said she started
telling them their stories when they were babies. “I was like
Seinfeld,” said Mrs. Johnson, who is a program coordinator for the
Center for Surrogate Parenting in California. “I needed to practice my
material.”

As the children got older and had more questions, Mrs. Johnson had
more explaining to do about their surrogate. “Lily would say to me,
‘Why don’t I look like you?’ ” Mrs. Johnson said. “She was maybe 3 at
the time. I would say, ‘Because you look just like Daddy, and you have
Natalie’s gorgeous hair and skin.’ ” Lily knew all about her
surrogate, Natalie, because her mother had been talking about Natalie
since Lily was a baby.

“So when Lily was 9 years old, she said: ‘Mom, I have figured out that
I’m not from your eggs. And I think Dad and Natalie make a pretty cute
couple,’ ” recalled Mrs. Johnson, whose husband died several years
ago.

“I said: ‘Lily, well, Natalie and Dad were never a couple. You were
only created in the doctor’s office because I was going to be your
mother. Would you like to see your birth certificate — because I’m
going to be your mother forever.’ ”


*So little Lily's birth certificate (original & only) is fraudulant? Sounds alot like an adoptee's "amended" birth certificate. When the state issues a "Certificate of LIVE BIRTH" it is only right to make sure it is factual and true. The mother who actually gives birth, and/or whose "genetic material" created the child should be listed. It is a sad day when a child's birth certificate isn't factual and she may never know who her true DNA comes from, or who her "oven" really was. This is beyond ridiculous. More state-sanctioned identity theft.

July 9, 2009

Shine A Light


The Adoptee Rights Demonstration
July 21, 2009
People’s Plaza, Philadelphia, PA

American-born adult adoptees in all but the states of Alaska, Kansas, Alabama, Oregon, New Hampshire and Maine do not have the right that unadopted American-born citizens do: The right to have a copy of their original birth certificate.

In many states across the USA, original birth certificates were sealed to protect the adoptee and adoptive family from the “shame of illegitimacy”. The intent was not to keep an adoptee from knowing his or her own information; it was to keep that information from the general public. States never promised privacy to birth parents, nor did birth parents ever sign anything concerning privacy when surrendering their child for adoption.

Today, millions of adoptees are routinely denied access to their original birth certificates. Our goal is to bring awareness to the people, that this practice is discriminatory and harmful. We wish to see the remaining states restore unfettered access to original birth certificates for all adult adoptees.

Join us at the Adoptee Rights Demonstration, at 11am on July 21, 2009. We will be starting at The People’s Plaza in Independence Park, Philadelphia, PA , and ending at the Pennsylvania Convention Center, where the National Convention of State Legislatures will be taking place. There we will have the opportunity to interact with and educate hundreds of lawmakers concerning these antiquated and unjust laws.

We will be at The People’s Plaza at Independence Park at 10:30 for an informational session and press interviews. Please contact us for more information regarding these opportunities.

The Adoptee Rights Demonstration is a registered participant with the National Conference of State Legislatures. We will be at booth #935 inside the Pennsylvania Convention Center for the Conference, to be held July 21, 22, and 23, 2009.

For more information, please visit our website at http://www.adopteerights.net

Email: AdopteeRightsPhilly@gmail.com
Phone: 267-234-7925